测量学习、教育和培训效应的EFI评价框架

C.M.STRACKE

测量学习、教育和培训效应的EFI评价框架

C.M.STRACKE

1.
杜伊斯堡埃森大学 TELIT研究院, 埃森 45141, 德国

详细信息

中图分类号: G436
计量
- 文章访问数: 1302
- HTML全文浏览量: 40
- PDF下载量: 1494
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-11-01
- 修回日期: 2014-01-01
- 刊出日期: 2014-03-25

Evaluation framework EFI for measuring the impact of learning, education and training

C. M. STRACKE

1.
TELIT Research Institute for Technology-Enhanced Learning and Economic and

摘要

摘要: 文章主要介绍了测量学习、教育和培训效应的EFI评价框架：效应测量评价框架以IDEAl模型为参考模型，用于特定的评价阶段及其目标和任务，以促进和优化学习、教育、培训的素质拓展.文章在对IDEAL参考模型进行了简要的介绍之后描述了效应测量的评价框架，并展现了效应测量评价框架在ARISTOTELE项目中的应用.
- EFI评估框架 /
- 效应测量 /
- IDEAL参考模型 /
- 评估 /
- 素质拓展 /
- 内部评估 /
- 外部评估 /
- 指标 /
- 战略目标 /
- ARISTOTELE
Abstract: This article introduces the Evaluation Framework EFI for the Impact Measurement of learning, education and training: The Evaluation Framework for Impact Measurement was developed for specifying the evaluation phase and its objectives and tasks within the IDEAL Reference Model for the introduction and optimization of quality development within learning, education and training. First, a description of the Evaluation Framework for Impact Measurement will be provided, followed by a brief overview of the IDEAL Reference Model. Finally, an example for the implementation of the Evaluation Framework for Impact Measurement within the ARISTOTELE project is presented.
- evaluation framework EFI /
- impact measurement /
- IDEAL reference model /
- assessment /
- quality development /
- internal evaluation /
- external evaluation /
- indicators /
- strategic objectives /
- ARISTOTELE

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1]

［1］ ARISTOTELE (2012). The ARISTOTELE Evaluation Framework: Evaluation Methodologies and Pilot Trials Definitions (D9.2).

［2］ BERG B L. (1989). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.

［3］ CHERMACK T J, KASSHANNA B K. The Use and Misuse of SWOT Analysis and Implications for HRD Professionals. In: Human Resource Development International 2007, 10(4): 383-399.

［4］ CHESBROUGH H W, WEST J, VANHAVERBEKE W. (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

［5］ CROSBY P B. (1980). Quality is Free. The art of making quality certain. New York: McGraw-Hill.

［6］ DEMING W E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

［7］ DEMING W E. (1982). Quality, productivity and competitive position. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

［8］ DONABEDIAN A. (1980). The Definition of Quality and Approaches to Its Assessment ［= Explorations in Quality Assessment and Monitoring, vol. 1］. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press, 1980.

［9］ DRUCKER P F. (1999). Management Challenges of the 21st Century. Harper Business, New York.

［10］ FEIGENBAUM A. (1986). Total Quality Control. Engineering and management. New York: McGraw-Hill.

［11］ GASSMANN O, ENKEL E, CHESBROUGH H W. The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 2010, 40(3): 213-221.

［12］ ISHIKAWA K. (1985). What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

［13］ ISO 9000:2005 (2005). Quality Management Systems. Fundamentals and Vocabulary. Geneva: International Organisation of Standardization (ISO).

［14］ ISO 9001:2008 (2008). Quality Management Systems. Requirements. Geneva: International Organisation of Standardization (ISO).

［15］ ISO/IEC 19796-1:2005 (2005). Information Technology-Learning, Education, and Training—Quality Management, Assurance and Metrics—Part 1: General Approach. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization (ISO).

［16］ JURAN J M. (1992). Juran on quality by design. The new steps for planning quality into goods and services. New York: Free Press.

［17］ JURAN J M. (Ed.) (1951). Quality Control Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Quantitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

［18］ SINGH K. (2007). Quantitative Social research methods. New Delhi: Sage Publication.

［19］ SOIN S S. (1992). Total Quality Essentials. New York: McGraw-Hill.

［20］ STRACKE C M. (2013). “Open Learning: The Concept for Modernizing School Education and Lifelong Learning through the Combination of Learning Innovations and Quality”; in: Stracke, Christian M. (Ed.): Learning Innovations and Quality: The Future of Digital Resources, Berlin: Logos. p. 15-28.

［21］ STRACKE C M. (2012). “Learning Innovations and Learning Quality: Relations, Interdependences, and Future”; in: Stracke, Christian M. (Ed.): The Future of Learning Innovations and Learning Quality. How do they fit together?, Berlin: Gito. p. 13-25.

［22］ STRACKE C M. (2010a). “Quality development and standards in learning, education, and training: adaptation model and guidelines for implementations”; in: Информатизация образования и науки ［=Информике (Informika), ISSN 2073-7572］; Vol. 7 (3), 2010. Moscow (Russian Federation): Informika. p. 136-146.

［23］ STRACKE C M. (2010b). “Quality and Standards in Learning, Education, and Training: The Adaptation Model IDEA for the Introduction of Quality Development”; in: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Past and Future of e-Learning Standards. Tokyo (Japan). p. 26-36.

［24］ STRACKE C M. (2009). “Quality Development and Standards in e-Learning: Benefits and Guidelines for Implementations”; in: Proceedings of the ASEM Lifelong Learning Conference: e-Learning and Workplace Learning. Bangkok (Thailand) ［online available at: http://www.qualitydevelopment.eu/docs］.

［25］ STRACKE C M. (2006a). Process-oriented Quality Management. In Pawlowski J. & Ehlers, U. (Eds.) European Handbook on Quality and Standardisation in E-Learning. Berlin: Springer, 79-96.

［26］ STRACKE C M. (2006b). Interoperability and Quality Development in e-Learning. In Proceedings of the Asia-Europe e-Learning Colloquy. Seoul: e-ASEM ［online available at: http://www.qualitydevelopment.eu/docs］.

［27］ THOMPSON J L, MARTIN F. (2005). Strategic management: Awareness and change. London: Thomson learning.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计