Effects of reclamation on phytoplankton community structure and biodiversity in Jiaojiang Estuary
-
摘要: 通过对椒江口(28.67~28.69N,121.45~121.62E)浮游植物进行的3次采样调查(2007年7月、2008年7月和2010年8月),并与历史数据进行比较,共鉴定出浮游植物5门,167种,三个年份分别为101、96和117种;浮游植物细胞丰度分别为20.34103 个/L、266.94103 个/L和66.94103 个/L;Shannon-Wiener指数(H)分别为1.95、0.60和0.40.围垦前和围垦结束后优势种包括硅藻(Bacillariophyta)和甲藻(Pyrrophyta),如琼氏圆筛藻(Coscinodiscus jonesianus)、辐射圆筛藻(Coscinodiscus radiatus)、中肋骨条藻(Skeletonema costatum)和柔弱根管藻(Rhizosolenia delicatula)等;围垦中只有硅藻,如洛氏角毛藻(Chaetoceros lorenzianus)和布氏双尾藻(Ditylum brightwellii).围垦促进了浮游植物细胞丰度的大幅度提升,但改变了浮游植物群落结构,降低了其稳定性和均衡性.CCA分析表明,pH、温度、氮/磷/硅营养盐、溶解氧和化学需氧量是影响浮游植物群落结构的水质参数;影响绿藻(Chlorophyta)、硅藻、蓝藻(Cyanophyta)和甲藻的主要水质参数分别为溶解氧、石油、温度和化学需氧量.长时间尺度与短时时间尺度分析得出相似的结论,围垦前后椒江口水质、浮游植物群落结构及生物多样性均发生相应变化.Abstract: Investigations on phytoplankton of Jiaojiang Estuary(28.67~28.69N, 121.45~121.62E) were carried out in July 2007, July 2008, and August 2010, and compared with historical data. 5 Phylums and 167 species were identified in the three investigations which were 101, 96 and 117 respectively before,inning and after reclamation. Cell abundance of phytoplankton were 20.34103 cell /L, 266.94103 cell /L and 66.94103 cell /L, and Shannon-Wiener Index of phytoplankton were 1.95, 0.60 and 0.40 respectively. Dominant species of phytoplankton included Bacillariophyta and Pyrrophyta before and after reclamation, such as Coscinodiscus jonesianus, Coscinodiscus radiatus, Skeletonema costatum, Rhizosolenia delicatula, but only Bacillariophyta existed inning reclamation, such as Chaetoceros lorenzianus and Ditylum brightwellii. Reclamation promoted the enhancement of cell abundance but reduced the stability and balance of phytoplankton community structure. CCA analysis showed that pH, temperature, nitrogen/phosphorus/silicon nutrients, dissolved oxygen and chemical oxygen demand were the main water quality parameters affecting community structure of phytoplankton. The main water quality parameters affecting Chlorophyta, Bacillariophyta, Cyanophyta and Pyrrophyta were dissolved oxygen, oil, temperature and chemical oxygen demand respectively. Long time scale and short time scale analysis come to similar conclusions that water quality , community structure and biodiversity of phytoplankton have changed before and after reclamation of Jiaojiang Estuary.
-
Key words:
- phytoplankton /
- community structure /
- biodiversity /
- reclamation /
- Jiaojiang Estuary
-
[1] [1] HORN H. The relative importance of climate and nutrients in controlling phytoplankton growth in Saidenbach Reservoir[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2003, 504(1/3): 159-166.[2] PETER H W, SIGRID B S, SHUHEI N. Introduction to species diversity of marine zooplankton[J]. Deep Sea Res II, 2010, 57(24-26): 2061-2063.[3] IRENA VT, VLADISLAV V K. Principal processes within the Estuarine salinity gradient: A review[J]. Mar Pollut Bull, 2010, 61(2-4): 149-155.[4] JIN Z Y, TANG J J, CHEN X, et al. Ecological assessment on tidal flat reclamation: A case study on Shangyu tidal flat, Zhejiang Province,China[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2008, 24(6): 806-809.[5] ARBUBOV R. Species diversity and phasing of disturbance[J]. Ecology, 1982, 63: 289-293.[6] 孙鲁峰, 徐兆礼, 邢小丽, 等. 椒江口海域浮游植物与富营养化的关系[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2012, 18(2): 170-176.[7] 赵永强,曾江宁,高爱根, 等. 椒江口潮间带大型底栖动物的生态位[J]. 应用生态学报,2009, 20(5): 1176-1183.[8] 赵永强, 曾江宁, 高爱根, 等. 椒江口滩涂大型底栖动物群落格局与多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(3): 303-309.[9] 赵永强, 陈全震, 曾江宁, 等. 椒江口潮间带多毛类动物时空分布与环境因子的关系[J]. 中国水产科学, 2009, 16(4): 580-587.[10] 郭琳,陈植华.椒江口-台州湾悬浮泥沙分布特征遥感研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007,29(5):49-52.[11] 国家海洋局. GB17378.7—2007《海洋调查规范》[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.[12] 国家海洋局. GB17378.4—2007《海洋调查规范》[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.[13] 赵志模, 周新远. 生态学引论[M]. 重庆: 科学技术文献出版社重庆分社, 1984: 108-119.[14] BRAY J R, CURTIS J T. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin[J]. Ecological Monographs, 1957, 27(4): 325-349.[15] 欧剑, 杨勇, 马进荣. 临海疏港公路对台州湾水动力影响的模拟研究[J]. 海洋学研究, 2010, 28(2): 79-89.[16] 陈永林.中国主要蝗虫及蝗灾的生态学治理[M].北京: 科学出版社, 2007: 148-150.[17] BALOD M, PURINA I, BECHEMIN C, et al. Effect of nutrient enrichment on the growth rates and community〖JP2〗 structure of summer phytoplankton from the Gulf of Riga, Baltic Sea [J]. J Plankton Res, 1998, 20(12): 2251-2271.〖JP〗[18] 林峰竹, 吴玉霖, 于海成, 等. 2004年长江口浮游植物群落结构特征分析[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 2008, 39(4): 401-410.[19] SUIKKANEN S, LAAMANEN M, HUTTUNEN M. Long term changes in summer phytoplankton communities of the open northern Baltic Sea[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2006, 71(3/4): 580-592.[20] 马长安, 徐霖林, 田伟, 等.围垦对南汇东滩湿地大型底栖动物的影响[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(4): 1007-1015.[21] PATERSON D M. Short term changes in the erodibility of inter tidal cohesive sediments related to the migratory behavior or epipelic diatoms[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 1989, 34(1): 223-234.[22] 周然. 渤海湾浮游植物种群变化及其影响因素[J]. 水道港口, 2012, 33(1): 72-76.[23] 朱根海, 宁修仁, 蔡昱明, 等. 南海浮游植物种类组成和丰度分布的研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2003, 25(supp.2): 8-23.[24] 田志强, 田秉晖, 辛丽, 等. 于桥水库秋季浮游植物群落结构与水质因子的关系[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2011, 33(5): 64-68.[25] 杨东方, 高振会, 王培刚, 等. 营养盐Si 和水温影响浮游植物的机制[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2006, 25(1):1-6. [26] LI K Y, LIU X B, ZHAO X G, et al. Effects of Reclamation Projects on Marine Ecological Environment in Tianjin Harbor Industrial Zone. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2010, 2: 792-799. [27] 刘文盈, 张秋良, 高润宏, 等.盐沼湿地浮游植物多样性与环境关系研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2012, 38(1): 5-8.[28] 罗民波, 陆健健, 沈新强,等. 大型海洋工程对洋山岛周围海域大型底栖动物生态分布的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2007, 26(1): 97-102.[29] 车越, 杨凯, 邰俊. 黄浦江上游来水与黄浦江水源水质内在关联研究[J]. 环境污染与防治, 2004, 26(3): 167-171.[30] 蔡文倩, 刘录三, 乔飞, 等.渤海湾大型底栖生物群落结构变化及原因探讨[J]. 环境科学, 2012, 33(9):3104-3105.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1504
- HTML全文浏览量: 42
- PDF下载量: 1691
- 被引次数: 0