上海市6条中小河道水质月动态评价及解析

马明海; 黄民生; 胡伟; 魏金豹; 刘素芳; 马俊飞; 韩莉

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2015.02.004

上海市6条中小河道水质月动态评价及解析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2015.02.004

1.
华东师范大学生态与环境科学学院,上海200062;
2.
黄山学院生命与环境科学学院,安徽黄山245041

基金项目:

国家科技重大专项（2013ZX07310001, 2014ZX07101012）;国家自然科学基金（51278192）;上海市学科带头人计划（11XD1402100）

详细信息

作者简介:
马明海, 男, 博士研究生.研究方向为河道治理与修复.E-mail: maminghai@hsu.edu.cn.

通讯作者:
黄民生, 男, 教授, 博士生导师. 研究方向为水环境治理与修复.

中图分类号: X824
计量
- 文章访问数: 1033
- HTML全文浏览量: 50
- PDF下载量: 1007
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-07-29
- 刊出日期: 2015-03-25

Analysis and assessment on monthly dynamics of water quality in six medium and small creeks in Shanghai

1.
School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
2.
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Huang Shan University, Huangshan Anhui 245041, China

摘要

摘要: 2013年3月至2014年2月，以上海市6条中小型河道为研究对象，选择pH、WT、DO、SD、NH4+-N、TN、DP、TP、CODCr、CODMn、BOD5、TOC和Chl-a作为水质评价因子，分别采用主成分分析法、综合污染指数法、综合营养状态指数法、有机污染指数法和综合水质标识指数法评价河道水环境质量，并对各评价方法和污染源进行分析.结果表明，6条河道水环境质量的空间差异性较大，其中淡江河污染最严重，工业河次之，丽娃河水质最好.TN和TP是6条河道水环境的主要污染因子.6条河道中的磷均以溶解性磷酸盐为主，工业河、长浜河、真如港和淡江河中的氮以氨氮为主，樱桃河和丽娃河以硝酸盐氮为主.
- 水环境质量 /
- 中小河道 /
- 指数评价 /
- 月动态 /
- 主成分分析
Abstract: The parameters of water quality such as pH, WT, DO, SD, NH4+-N,TN,DP,TP,CODCr,CODMn,BOD5,TOC和Chl-a were chosen as primary assessment factors to evaluate the water quality of six medium and small creeks in Shanghai by principal component analysis, comprehensive pollution index, comprehensive nutritive index, organic pollution index and comprehensive water quality identification index from Match 2013 to February 2014. The evaluation methods were compared, and pollution sources of creeks were also analyzed. Results showed that great spatial difference was obtained among the water qualities of six creeks. The water quality of Danjiang creek was the worst, followed by Gongye creek, and that of Liwa creek was the best. TN and TP were the main primary pollution factors. The major form of total phosphorus in the six creeks was existed as dissolved phosphorus. The main form of nitrogen in creeks of Gongye, Changbang, Zhenru and Danjiang was of ammonia nitrogen. However, nitrate nitrogen was considered as the main form of nitrogen in creeks of Yingtao and Liwa.
- water quality medium and small creek index evaluation monthlydynamics principal component analysis /

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1]

1］CHANG H. Spatial analysis of water quality trends in the Han River basin, South Korea ［J］. Water Research, 2008, 42: 32853304.

［2］EVERARD M, MOGGRIDGE H L. Rediscovering the value of urban rivers［J］. Urban Ecosystem, 2012, 15(2): 293314.

［3］RANADE V. Human activities and health of rivers: Case study of a river basin in the peninsular India ［R］//Proceedings of the 4th International Yellow River Forum on Ecological Civilization and River Ethics.［s.l.］:［s.n.］, 2010(3): 213217.

［4］SHORT A G. Governing change: Landuse change and the prevention of nonpoint source pollution in the north coastal basin of Californi［J］.Environmental Management, 2013, 51(1): 108125.

［5］WANG X, LI J Q, LI Y X, et al. Is urban development an urban river killer? A case study of Yongding Diversion Channel in Beijing, China ［J］. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 26(6): 12321237.

［6］UTHPALA P., BASANT M. A framework for assessing river health in periurban landscapes ［J］. Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology, 2014, 14(2): 121131.

［7］OUYANG Y, NKEDIKIZZA P, WU QT, et al. Assessment of seasonal variations in surface water quality ［J］. Water Research, 2006, 40: 38003810.

［8］尹海龙, 徐祖信. 河流综合水质评价方法比较研究［J］. 长江流域资源与环境, 2008, 17(5): 729733.

［9］XU H S, XU Z X, WU W, et al. Assessment and Spatiotemporal Variation Analysis of Water Quality in the Zhangweinan River Basin, China［J］. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 13, 1641652.

［10］GHARIBI H, MAHVI A H, NABIZADEH R, et al. A novel approach in water quality assessment based on fuzzy logic ［J］. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 112: 8795.

［11］上海市水务局, 上海市统计局. 上海市第一次水利普查暨第二次水资源普查公报［R］. 上海: 中国水利普查, 2013.

［12］刘新宇. 上海水环境与河道治理的思考［J］. 环境经济,2012(1): 5258.

［13］陶征楷, 毕春娟, 陈振楼, 等. 上海市河网水体中As的分布特征及其生态风险评价［J］.生态毒理学报, 2013, 8(2): 268274.

［14］HUANG F, WANG X Q, LOU L P, et al. Spatial variation and source apportionment of water pollution in Qiantang River (China) using statistical techniques ［J］. Water Research, 2010, 44(5): 15621572.

［15］沈冰良, 崔莹, 朱卓毅, 等. 苏州河和黄浦江颗粒态氨基酸的季节变化［J］. 华东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2014(1): 99106.

［16］程曦, 李小平,陈小华. 苏州河水质和底栖动物群落1996～2006年的时空变化［J］. 生态学报, 2009, 29(6): 32783287.

［17］董倩倩, 张艾, 李咏梅, 等. 黄浦江溶解有机质光学特性与消毒副产物NDMA生成潜能的关系［J］. 环境科学, 2014, 35(3): 958963.

［18］陈伟, 徐左正, 叶舜涛, 等. 苏州河支流综合整治工程［J］. 给水排水, 2002, 28(2):3134.

［19］徐祖信, 廖振良, 张锦平. 基于数学模型的苏州河上游和支流水质对干流水质的影响分析［J］. 水动力学研究与进展, 2004, 19(6): 733743.

［20］OUYANG Y. Evaluation of river water quality monitoring stations by principal component analysis ［J］. Water Research, 2005, 39(12): 26212635.

［21］牟春友, 徐坤. 在评价微污染水体中均值污染指数评价方法和活性污染指数评价方法的比较［J］.中国环境监测, 2009, 25(3): 104106.

［22］阮仁良, 黄长缨. 苏州河水质黑臭评价方法和标准的探讨［J］.上海水务, 2002, 18(3):3236.

［23］徐祖信.我国河道综合水质标识指数评价方法研究［J］ .同济大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 33(4): 482488.

［24］WANG Y, WANG P, BAI Y J, et al. Assessment of surface water quality via multivariate statistical techniques: A case study of the Songhua River Harbin region, China ［J］. Journal of Hydroenvironment Research, 2013(7): 3040.

［25］黄民生, 徐亚同, 陈邦林, 等. 丽娃河环境治理与生态恢复工程［J］. 净水技术, 2005, 24(6): 5659.

［26］张海春, 胡雄星, 韩中豪. 黄浦江水系水质变化及原因分析［J］. 中国环境监测, 2013, 29(4): 5559.

［27］黄强, 张泽中, 王宽, 等. 改进污径比计算方法及应用［J］. 安全与环境学报, 2008, 8(1): 3739.

［28］李玲玲,顾行发,赵文吉,等.北京公园湖泊水环境监测及灰色关联度分析评价［J］. 水资源与水工程学报, 2014, 25(1): 3337.

［29］张小君, 徐中民, 宋晓谕, 等. 几种水环境质量评价方法在青海湖入湖河流中的应用［J］. 环境工程, 2013, 31(1): 117121.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计