长江河口石洞口水域电厂温排水输运扩散观测和分析

张沈裕; 朱建荣

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2016.02.013

长江河口石洞口水域电厂温排水输运扩散观测和分析

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2016.02.013

张沈裕¹,
朱建荣^2, ,

1.
华能上海石洞口第一电厂,上海200942;
2.
华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室,上海200062

详细信息

作者简介:
张沈裕，女，工程师，从事火电厂土木、水工专业工作.E-mail: wish_for_lz@163.com.

通讯作者:
朱建荣，男，教授，博士生导师，从事河口海洋学研究.

中图分类号: Q948
计量
- 文章访问数: 433
- HTML全文浏览量: 17
- PDF下载量: 756
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-04-01
- 刊出日期: 2016-03-25

Observation and analyses of transport and diffusion of warm discharge water from the power plants near Shidongkou in the Changjiang Estuary

ZHANG Shen-Yu¹,
ZHU Jian-Rong^{2
, ,}

摘要

摘要: 本文基于2014年11月23日至12月2日观测资料，分析石洞口附近水域电厂温排水输运扩散.在大潮期间，从水温纵向断面分布看由电厂排放的温排水明显，落潮时段最大温升4.1oC，涨潮时段最大温升达到5.1oC；仅在排水口附近水温出现分层现象，其他地方因潮流的强烈混合作用，水温垂向分布趋于均匀.从水温和温升平面分布看，在落潮时段沿岸水温高，离岸水温低，在华能石洞口电厂排水口附近温升最大量值达到4.0oC，温排水在落潮流和科氏力作用下沿岸向下游输运扩散.在涨潮时段石洞口附近高温水相比于落潮时段偏向上游，离岸范围大，温升最大值达到4.2oC.从定点连续测点的流速、流向和水温随时间变化看，若测点位于电厂上游涨潮期间水温上升，若测点位于电厂下游落潮期间水温上升，水温受附近电厂温排水影响.测点离电厂排水口越近温升越高、垂向变化越明显.小潮期间，由于寒潮过境，因表面失热，水温比大潮期间低，最大水温出现在电厂排水口附近水体中层.温升的分布特征与大潮期间类似，最大量值达到5.0oC，比大潮期间高了0.8oC，原因在于小潮期间潮流和潮混合较小，温排水口高温水不易向外输运扩散.
- 温排水 /
- 输运扩散 /
- 现场观测 /
- 长江河口
Abstract: The transport and diffusion of warm discharge water from the power plants near Shidongkou in the Changjiang Estuary were analyzed based on the observation data from November 23 to December 2 in 2014. During the spring tide, in terms of the longitudinal distribution of water temperature, warm discharge water from the power plants was evident, and had the maximum water temperature rise of 4.1oC in ebb tide, and of 5.1oC in flood tide; water temperature was stratification only near the discharge port, and trended to vertical uniform in other area due to strong mixing induced by tidal current. In terms of horizontal distribution of water temperature and water temperature rise, water temperature was higher along the coast and lower away from the coast, and reached the maximum value of 4.0oC near the discharge ports of Huaneng Shidongkou power plants during the ebb tide. The warm discharge water was transported and diffused downstream along the coast forced by the ebb current and Coriolis force. Compared during ebb tide, the higher temperature water near the Shidongkou move upstream and farer away the coast during flood tide, the maximum water temperature rise reached to 4.2oC. In terms of current speed and direction, water temperature measured at the continuous sites, water temperature rise during flood tide if the measured sites located in the upper reaches of the power plant, and descend during ebb tide if the measured sites located in the lower reaches of the power plant, was influenced distinctly by the near warm discharge water from the power plants. The more the measured site closer to discharge port of power plant, the higher the water temperature was, and the more obvious the vertical variation was. During the neap tide, water temperature was lower than during spring tide due to the passage of the cold front and heat loss at the river surface, the maximum water temperature near the power plant appeared at the middle water layer. The distribution characteristic of warm water rise was similar to the one during spring tide. The maximum warm water rise reached to 5.0oC which was higher 0.8oC than the one during spring tide because the tidal current and mixing was weaker during neap tide, and the higher temperature water near the warm water discharge port was not easy to be outward transport and diffusion.
- warm discharge watertransport and diffusionfield observationChangjiang Estuary /

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1]

［1］HARLEMAN D R F, HALL L C. Thermal diffusion of condenser water in a river during steady and unsteady flows with application to the T.V. A. Browns Ferry nuclear power plant ［J］. Hydrodynamics Laboratory Report, 1968 (3): 98115.

［2］MCGUIRK J J, RODI W. A depthaveraged mathematical model for the near field of side discharges into openchannel flow［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 86(4):761781.

［3］HAMRICK J M, MILLS W B. Analysis of water temperatures in Conowingo Pond as influenced by the Peach Bottom atomic power plant thermal discharge［J］. Environmental Science & Policy, 2000(3):197209.

［4］MOATAR F, GAILHARD J. Water temperature behaviour in the River Loire since 1976 and 1881［J］. ComptesRendus Geoscience, 2006, 338(5):319328.

［5］WEBB B W, NOBILIS F. Water temperature behaviour in the River Danube during the twentieth century［J］. Hydrobiologia, 1994, 291(2):105113.

［6］POORNIMA E H, RAJADURAI M, RAO T S, et al. Impact of thermal discharge from a tropical coastal power plant on phytoplankton［J］. Journal of Thermal Biology, 2005, 30(4):307316.

［7］张继民.电厂温排水对水生生物的热影响及水质影响研究［D］. 南京:河海大学环境学院，2006.

［8］吴海杰,王志刚,陈淑丰. 滨海电站温排水数值模［J］.电力环境保护,2005,21(4):4851.

［9］杨芳丽,谢作涛,张小峰,等.非正交曲线坐标系平面二维电厂温排水模拟［J］.水利水运工程学报,2005(2):3640.

［10］崔丹,姜治兵. 近岸海域电厂温排水数值模拟［J］. 长江科学院院报, 2008, 25(2): 1315.

［11］何国建,赵慧明,方红卫.潮汐影响下电厂温排水运动的三维数值模拟［J］. 水力发电学报, 2008,27(3):125136.

［12］朱军政. 强潮海湾温排水三维数值模拟［J］. 水力发电学报, 2007, 26(4): 5660.

［13］许晟轶，朱建荣，陈昞睿.长江河口石洞口电厂扩建工程温排水三维数值模拟［J］.华东师范大学学报：自然科学版，2010(6):2634.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计