国内网络地图服务比较分析研究

De-tian ZHANG; Jia-ao WANG; Fei CHEN

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2017.06.008

国内网络地图服务比较分析研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2017.06.008

江南大学数字媒体学院, 江苏无锡 214122

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（6170227，61602214）；江苏省自然科学基金（BK20160191）

详细信息

作者简介:

中图分类号: TP399
计量
- 文章访问数: 165
- HTML全文浏览量: 66
- PDF下载量: 591
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-04-20
- 刊出日期: 2017-11-25

A comprehensive study of mapping services in China

School of Digital Media, Jiangnan University, Wuxi Jiangsu 214122, China

摘要

摘要: 网络地图服务已被广泛应用于日常生活中，人们使用这些服务来进行定位，查询最短路线，甚至预订酒店、打车等.因此，过去几年国内也随之出现了越来越多的地图服务提供商，如百度地图、高德地图、搜狗地图、腾讯地图、谷歌地图以及必应地图等.然而，面对如此繁多的网络地图服务，国内目前还没有关于针对用户和开发人员如何选择合适地图服务的研究成果，而国外在这方面已有不少相关工作.鉴于此，本论文针对六个主流移动地图APP和网络API展开全面的功能和性能对比，并总结性分析了国内最受青睐的三种地图API，即百度地图API，高德地图API和搜狗地图API.为读者在选择合适的地图服务时提供有价值的参考.
- 地图服务 /
- 地图APP /
- 地图API /
- 分析研究 /
- 百度地图
Abstract: The mapping services have been widely used in our daily lives. People can use the services to find their nearest POI (Point of Interests), the shortest travel route from a source location to a destination location, and even life services like booking hotels, calling taxis and so on. Consequently, more and more mapping service providers have emerged in the past years in China, like Baidu Maps, Amap, Sogou Maps, Tencent Maps, Google Maps and Bing Maps. However, there is no existing study on how to select the suitable one for users/developers when they facing so many different mapping service providers. In this paper, we make thorough comparisons and experiments on mobile APPs and Web APIs of the six mapping service providers in China, and present the most three popular native mapping APIs, i.e., Baidu Maps API, Amap API and Sogou Maps API, to give readers a valuable guider for selecting their suitable mapping services.
- mapping services /
- maps APP /
- mapping API /
- comprehensive study /
- Baidu Maps

HTML全文

Fig. 1 The number of mobile map users and growth rate in China (from Analysys)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Fig. 2 The market shares of Baidu Maps, Amap, Sogou Maps in China (from Analysys)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Tab. 1 Services provided by Maps APP (last checked: April 21, 2017)

		Baidu Maps	Amap	Sogou Maps	Tencent Maps	Google Maps	Bing Maps
iOS support		√	√	√	√	√	×
Android support		√	√	√	√	√	×
POI search		√	√	√	√	√	×
Route search	Driving	√	√	√	√	√	×
	Public transit	√	√	√	√	√	×
	Bicycling	√	√	×	√	√	×
	Walking	√	√	√	√	√	×
Zoom in/out		√	√	√	√	√	×
Traffic display		√	√	√	√	√	×
Satellite view		√	√	√	√	√	×
3D map view		√	×	√	√	×	×
Street view image		√	×	×	√	×	×
Voice support		√	√	√	√	√	×
Offline Maps download		√	√	√	√	√	×
Personal setting		√	√	√	√	√	×
Report (e.g., traffic, wrong POI)		√	√	√	×	×	×

下载: 导出CSV

Tab. 2 Service response time provided by Maps APP

	APP loading time (first time)/s	POI search response time/s	Route search response time/s	Zoom in/out response time/s
Baidu Maps	5.2	2.8	3.3	0.5
Amap	7.5	2.2	2.3	0.7
Sogou Maps	9.9	3.6	3.9	2.5
Tencent Maps	9.4	8.7	4.5	1.6
Google Maps	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Bing Maps	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

下载: 导出CSV

Tab. 3 Maps API comparisons (last checked: April 16, 2017)

	Baidu Maps	Amap	Sogou Maps	Tencent Maps	Google Maps	Bing Maps
JavaScript API¹	√	√	√	√	√	√
Static Maps API²	√	√	√	√	√	√
Street View Image API³	√	×	×	√	×	×
Android SDK⁴	√	√	×	√	√	√
iOS SDK⁵	√	√	×	√	√	√
Places API⁶	√	√	√	√	√	√
Geocoding API⁷	√	√	√	√	√	√
Directions API⁸	√	√	√	√	√	√
Distance Matrix API⁹	√	×	×	×	√	√

下载: 导出CSV

Tab. 4 Maps loading and API response time

	Web loading time/s	Android Web loading time/s	iOS Web loading time/s	Places API response time/s	Geocoding API response time/s	Distance API response time/s	Directions Matrix API response time/s
Baidu Maps	1.2	1.84	1.66	0.38	0.46	0.54	2.52
Amap	1.83	2.11	1.7	0.92	1.03	0.76	N/A
Sogou Maps	0.59	N/A	N/A	0.86	0.73	0.79	N/A
Tencent Maps	2.17	2.48	2.6	0.77	0.95	0.85	N/A
Google Maps	0.92	1.88	1.93	0.43	0.58	0.39	2.58
Bing Maps	0.88	1.64	1.52	0.32	0.49	0.47	2.1

下载: 导出CSV

Tab. 5 Types of Baidu Maps API

Web development	Common JavaScript API
	JavaScript API high-speed edition
	Web component API
Android development	Android map SDK
	Android location SDK
	Android navigation SDK
	Android panorama SDK
iOS development	iOS Map SDK
	iOS navigation SDK
	iOS panorama SDK
Service API	LBS Cloud
	Web Service API
	Static imagery API
	Panoramic static API
	Internet of vehicles API
	URI API
	Bird's Eye
Tool support	API console
	LBS cloud visualization controller
	Coordinate collection
	Map generator
	Map card
	Groupon plug-in
	Zero-cost switching tool
	Map editing tools
	Development sources

下载: 导出CSV

Tab. 6 Applicability of Baidu Maps API

Applicability	Coverage
Browser	IE 6. 0+, Firefox 3. 0+, Opera 9. 0+, Safari 3. 0+, Chrome
Operating System	Windows, Mac, Linux
Facility Type	PC, mobile phones and other mobile clients
Calling Mode	Online calling
	Place API and Place suggestion API 100 000 times/day/KEY
	Direction API 100 000 times/day/KEY
	Geocoding API 100 000 times/day
	Coordinate conversion API no access limit
Access Times	The number of concurrent users: 1 000-1 500 times/sec to calculate
and	according to the initial JS per second
Access Frequency	Search services: 800 times/sec
	Bus, car service: 600 times/sec
	Geocoding performance: 200 times/sec
	Bandwidth limit: full support for services (due to the small
	amount of API data)
	Coordinate conversion interface: single IP 50 times/sec (if more than 100 times,
	returning back to 403 error)
	Static imagery: independent IP 10/sec.

下载: 导出CSV

Tab. 7 Types of Amap API

Web and server development	JavaScript API
	Nephogram API
	Map component
	Static mapping API
	URI API
	Easy map website building
Android development	Android SDK
	Android nephogram SDK
	Android navigation SDK
	Android street view SDK
	Android location SDK
iOS development	iOS SDK
	iOS navigation SDK
	iOS nephogram SDK
Map tools	Coordinate collection
	Quick map generator
	Map card
In the laboratory	Vector web maps
	Indoor maps
	iOS street view
Windows platform	Windows phone SDK

下载: 导出CSV

Tab. 8 Access limits of Amap API

Types	Access limits per day/Key	Access limits per 10 minutes/Key
Geocoding/Reverse-geocoding	100 000	10 000
Place search	100 000	50 000
Inputting hints	100 000	50 000
Navigation	100 000	5 000
Road search	25 000	2 500
Static map	25 000	2 500
Positioning	100 000	5 000

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(17)

[1]	iiMedia Research[EB/OL]. (2014-07-20)[2017-03-19]. http://www.199it.com/archives/256990.html.
[2]	Aanlysys[EB/OL]. (2016-03-02)[2017-03-19]. http://www.askci.com/news/chanye/2016/03/02/154313qve2.shtml.
[3]	Aanlysys[EB/OL]. (2016-02-24)[2017-03-19]. http://www.cctime.com/html/2016-2-24/1140899.htm.
[4]	ZHANG D T, CHOW C Y, LI Q, et al. Efficient evaluation of k-NN queries using spatial mashups[C]//SSTD 2011: Advances in Spatial and Temporal Databases. 2011: 348-366.
[5]	ZHANG D T, CHOW C Y, LI Q, et al. SMashQ:Spatial mashup framework for k-NN queries in time-dependent road networks[J]. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 2013, 31(2):259-287. doi: 10.1007/s10619-012-7110-6
[6]	ZHANG D T, CHOW C Y, LI Q, et al. A spatial mashup service for efficient evaluation of concurrent k-NN queries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2016, 65(8):2428-2442. doi: 10.1109/TC.2015.2485215
[7]	ZHANG D T, CHOW C Y, LI Q, et al. Efficient evaluation of shortest travel-time path queries in road networks by optimizing waypoints in route requests through spatial mashups[C]//APWeb 2016: Web Technologies and Applications. 2016: 104-115.
[8]	ZHANG D T, CHOW C Y, LIU A, et al. Efficient evaluation of shortest travel-time path queries through spatial mashups[J/OL]. GeoInformatica, (2017-01-07)[2017-03-19]. http://doi:org/10.1007/s10707-016-0288-4" target="_blank">org/10.1007/s10707-016-0288-4">http://doi:org/10.1007/s10707-016-0288-4.
[9]	LI Y, YIU M L. Route-saver:Leveraging route apis for accurate and efficient query processing at location-based services[J]. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge & Data Engineering, 2015, 27(1):235-249. https://www.computer.org/csdl/trans/tk/2015/01/06816049.html
[10]	LEVANDOSKI J J, MOKBEL M F, KHALEFA M E. Preference query evaluation over expensive attributes[C]//Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. 2010: 319-328.
[11]	THOMSEN J R, YIU M L, JENSEN C S. Effiective caching of shortest paths for location-based services[C]//Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. 2012: 313-324.
[12]	ProgrammableWeb[EB/OL]. [2017-03-19]. http://www.programmableweb.com/category-api.
[13]	SAMET H, FRUIN B C, NUTANONG S. Duking it out at the smartphone mobile app mapping api corral: Apple, Google, and the competition[C]//Proceedings of the First ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Mobile Geographic Information Systems. 2012: 41-48.
[14]	SAMET H, NUTANONG S, FRUIN B C. Static presentation consistency issues in smartphone mapping apps[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2016, 59(5):88-98. doi: 10.1145/2930840
[15]	SAMET H, NUTANONG S, FRUIN B C. Dynamic presentation consistency issues in smartphone mapping apps[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2016, 59(9):58-67. doi: 10.1145/2991470
[16]	CNNIC[EB/OL]. (2013-06-24)[2017-03-19]. http://www.199it.com/archives/126997.html.
[17]	ZHANG D T, WANG J A, CHEN F. Which mapping service should we select in China[C]//DASFAA 2017: Database Systems for Advanced Applications. 2017: 47-59.