Performance and factors of phosphorus interception in storing multi-pond wetlands in the Erhai Lake Basin
-
摘要: 为考察洱海调蓄多塘湿地对磷的截留特征及效果，选取流域内12个调蓄多塘湿地进行定期跟踪调查，评估湿地中磷的截留性能，识别调蓄多塘湿地中磷的截留特征，解析调蓄多塘湿地中磷去除的主要影响因子.结果表明：调蓄多塘湿地的建立能够有效拦截面源污染携带的磷污染物，提升出水水质.湿地中η（PO43--P）、η（TP）和η（SS）平均截留效率分别为43.44%~93.88%、27.71%~89.67%和21.84%~62.12%.枯水期进水磷浓度高于丰水期，且枯水期磷的截留效率优于丰水期，枯水期间歇性断流提供足够的停留时间，有助于污染物的去除.ρo（TP）与ρi（PO43--P）（R=0.297）和ρi（TP）（R=0.304）显著正相关，η（TP）分别与调蓄多塘湿地进水ρi（PO43--P）（R=0.665）和ρi（TP）（R=0.740）呈显著正相关.调蓄多塘湿地对磷的持留效率主要取决于进水中磷酸根所占比例及总磷的浓度.该研究以期为调蓄多塘湿地在磷入湖负荷削减、流域污染治理和水体修复等领域的应用提供可靠的案例支持.Abstract: To investigate the characteristics and factors of phosphorus interception, phosphorus concentration from 12 storing multi-pond wetlands were analyzed. Evaluation of the removal efficiency and identification of the key factors of phosphorus removal were executed in the Erhai Lake Basin. The results showed that the water quality was effectively improved because phosphorus pollutants from the surface source pollution were intercepted in the storing multi-pond wetlands. The average interception efficiency value of η(PO43--P), η(TP) and η(SS) were 43.44%~93.88%、27.71%~89.67% and 21.84%~62.12%, respectively. Both the phosphorus concentration of the influent and the efficiency of phosphorus interception in the dry season were higher, respectively, than those in the wet season. Intermittent outflow of effluent provided a residence time which was long enough for the removal of pollutants in the dry season. While ρo(TP) had a significantly positive correlation with ρi(PO43--P) (R=0.297) and ρi(TP) (R=0.304). η(TP) showed a significant positive correlation with ρi(PO43--P) (R=0.665) and ρi(TP) (R=0.740). The efficiency of phosphorus removal primarily depended on the proportion of phosphate and the TP concentration of the influent. This study may provide support as an engineering case of multi-pond wetlands for the reduction of phosphorus into lakes, water pollution control in basins, and water restoration.
-
Key words:
- storing multi-pond wetlands /
- phosphorus /
- interception /
- basin
-
图 1 调蓄多塘湿地进水磷和SS含量的分布特征
Fig. 1 The characteristics of P and SS concentration of influent in storing multi-pond wetlands
图 2 调蓄多塘湿地出水磷和SS含量的分布特征
Fig. 2 The characteristics of P and SS concentration of effluent in storing multi-pond wetlands
图 4 不同水期下进水磷和SS特征分布
Fig. 4 Characteristics of P and SS distribution of influent in the dry and wet seasons
图 5 不同水期下出水磷和SS特征分布
Fig. 5 Characteristics of phosphorus and SS distribution of effluent in the dry and wet seasons
图 6 不同水期下磷和SS截留效果
Fig. 6 Efficiency of phosphorus and SS retention in the dry and wet seasons
表 1 调蓄多塘湿地经纬度及基本工艺参数
Tab. 1 Longitude, latitude coordinates and basic design parameters of storing multi-pond wetlands
名称 经度 纬度 面积/m$^{2}$ 平均水深/m H1 100$°$15$'$56.52$''$E 25$°$42$'$56.60$''$N 2 844.54 0.81 H2 100$°$15$'$53.63$''$E 25$°$71$'$41.59$''$N 1 612.08 0.46 H3 100$°$15$'$53.47$''$E 25$°$42$'$39.55$''$N 4 108.21 1.25 H4 100$°$17$'$14.21$''$E 25$°$41$'$38.38$''$N 4 721.84 1.08 H5 100$°$15$'$40.11$''$E 25$°$42$'$56.81$''$N 3 229.36 0.76 H6 100$°$19$'$11.98$''$E 25$°$41$'$30.93$''$N 5 880.20 1.36 H7 100$°$16$'$57.51$''$E 25$°$41$'$26.22$''$N 5 169.06 1.35 S1 100$°$07$'$35.94$''$E 25$°$56$'$15.14$''$N 5 176.00 1.28 S2 100$°$07$'$37.08$''$E 25$°$56$'$14.76$''$N 5 038.00 1.32 S3 100$°$06$'$16.60$''$E 25$°$56$'$04.42$''$N 8 400.42 1.50 S4 100$°$06$'$42.88$''$E 25$°$56$'$22.58$''$N 5 115.00 1.31 W1 100$°$08$'$09.21$''$E 25$°$47$'$14.72$''$N 7 699.05 2.00 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 调蓄多塘湿地进口磷、SS与磷去除率相关性分析
Tab. 2 Correlation analysis between phosphorus, SS of influent, and phosphorus removal efficiency in storing multi-pond wetlands
项目 $\rho _{\rm i}$(PO$_{4}^{3-}$-P) $\rho _{\rm i}$(TP) $\rho _{\rm i}$(SS) $\rho _{\rm o}$(TP) $\eta $(TP) $\rho _{\rm i}$(PO$_{4}^{3-}$-P) 1.000 $\rho _{\rm i}$(TP) 0.916$^{\ast \ast }$ 1.000 $\rho _{\rm i}$(SS) 0.147 0.163 1.000 $\rho _{\rm o}$(TP) 0.297$^{\ast \ast }$ 0.304$^{\ast \ast }$ 0.035 1.000 $\eta $(TP) 0.665$^{\ast \ast }$ 0.740$^{\ast \ast }$ 0.124 $-$0.335$^{\ast \ast }$ 1.000 注: **代表在0.01水平(双侧)上显著相关, $n$=84
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] WU M, TANG X Q, LI Q Y, et al. Review of ecological engineering solutions for rural non-point source water pollution control in Hubei Province, China[J]. Water Air &Soil Pollution, 2013, 224(5):1-18. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=d8d3b1e85f0a0f42058a61aca6a38ef3 [2] 翟玥, 尚晓, 沈剑, 等. SWAT模型在洱海流域面源污染评价中的应用[J].环境科学研究, 2012, 25(6):666-671. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjkxyj201206010 [3] 李强.洱海北部区域农村污水排放规律及控制技术研究[D].西安: 长安大学. 2015 http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10710-1015802391.htm [4] 羊华, 李红燕, 李丽怀. 2015年洱海入湖河流磷负荷时空变化与洱海富营养化浅析[J].人民珠江, 2017, 38(7):77-79. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/rmzj201707017 [5] 赵海超, 王圣瑞, 焦立新, 等. 2010年洱海全湖氮负荷时空分布特征[J].环境科学研究, 2013, 26(5):534-539. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20132013050700065678 [6] WANG S R, ZHENG B H, CHEN C, et al. Thematic issue:water of the Erhai and Dianchi Lakes[J]. Environmental Earth Science, 2015, 74(5):3685-3688. doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-4727-6 [7] 佚名.云南省开展调研洱海保护治理[J].给水排水, 2017(6):96-96. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20172017062100110604 [8] 金相灿, 胡小贞, 储昭升, 等. "绿色流域建设"的湖泊富营养化防治思路及其在洱海的应用[J].环境科学研究, 2011, 24(11):1203-1209. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjkxyj201111001 [9] 张毅敏, 张永春, 左玉辉.前置库技术在太湖流域面源污染控制中的应用探讨[J].环境污染与防治, 2003, 25(6):342-344. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3865.2003.06.008 [10] CHEN Q F, SHAN B Q, YI C Q, et al. An off-line filtering ditch-pond system for diffuse pollution control at Wuhan City Zoo[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2007, 30(4):373-380. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.04.008 [11] TANG W Z, ZHANG W Q, ZHAO Y, et al. Nitrogen removal from polluted river water in a novel ditch-wetland-pond system[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2013, 60(11):135-139. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=b6d9107a11304569aae35f1d88755cab [12] HU S J, NIU Z G, CHEN Y F. Global wetland datasets:A review[J]. Wetlands, 2017(1):1-11. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201701001 [13] 毛战坡, 彭文启, 尹澄清, 等.非点源污染物在多水塘系统中的流失特征研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2004, 1(3):530-535. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2004.03.027 [14] 吴若静, 谢三桃.多塘系统在巢湖山丘区面源污染控制中的应用[J].水利规划与设计, 2016(3):18-21 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2469.2016.03.008 [15] 黄慧君, 王永平, 李庆红.洱海流域近50年气候变化特征及其对洱海水资源的影响[J].气象, 2013, 39(4):436-442. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0827.2013.04.0012 [16] 陈纬栋.洱海流域农业面源污染负荷模型计算研究[D].上海: 上海交通大学, 2011. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/article/cdmd-10248-1011299391.htm [17] DAVIS T W, BULLERJAHN G S, TUTTLE T, et al. Effects of increasing nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations on phytoplankton community growth and toxicity during planktothrix blooms in Sandusky Bay, Lake Erie[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(12), 7197-7207. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=f1edb5f1d44b70d4fad508ac47a911bd [18] TU Y T, CHIANG P C, YANG J, et al. Application of a constructed wetland system for polluted stream remediation[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 510(3):70-78. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=49be96f0d59e023a5f5d95425965cd71 [19] ZHANG D, GERBERG R M KEAT T S, et al. Constructed wetlands in China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2009, 35(10):1367-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.07.007 [20] KADLEC R H, WALALLCE S D. Treatment Wetlands[M]. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press, 2008. [21] SCHOLES L, REVITT M, ELLIS J B, et al. A systematic approach for the comparative assessment of stormwater pollutant removal potentials[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008, 88:467-478. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=4c95baccb05610ab7c955876ee6254d1 [22] LUO P, LIU F, LIU X, et al. Phosphorus removal from lagoon-pretreated swine wastewater by pilot-scale surface flow constructed wetlands planted with Myriophyllum aquaticum[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 576:490-497. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.094 [23] ZHANG Y, CUI L J, LI W, et al. Performance evaluation of an integrated constructed wetland used to treat a contaminated aquatic environment[J]. Wetlands Ecology & Management, 2014, 22(5):493-507. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=0e722489db9d29c57a45bd802130a051 [24] 彭剑峰, 王宝贞, 王琳.塘-湿地组合处理系统中磷的主导去除机制分析[J].南京理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 29(5):609-612. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9830.2005.05.027 [25] BODIN H, PERSSON J, ENGLUND J E, et al. Influence of residence time analyses on estimates of wetland hydraulics and pollutant removal[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 501(10):1-12. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=44488a1f901efe92a41e5becbfc95d1a [26] DZAKPASU M, WANG X C, ZHENG Y C, et al. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus removal by a surface-flow constructed wetland for polluted river water treatment[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2015, 71(6):904-12. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=f8d0e7459f501bba1bd732c3cfeb8b2e [27] 李伟, 崔丽娟, 张岩, 等.水平潜流湿地磷去除效果及影响因子分析[J].湿地科学, 2014(4):464-470. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/87210X/201404/662079258.html [28] SPIELES D J, MITSCH W J. The effects of season and hydrologic and chemical loading on nitrate retention in con-structed wetlands:a comparison of low-and high-nutrient riverine systems[J]. Ecological Engineering, 1999, 14(1-2):77-91. doi: 10.1016/S0925-8574(99)00021-X [29] MA L, HE F, HUANG T, et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus transformations and balance in a pond-ditch circulation system for rural polluted water treatment[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016, 94:117-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.05.051 [30] MA L, HE F, SUN J, et al. Remediation effect of pond-ditch circulation on rural wastewater in southern China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 77:363-372. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.036 [31] AL-RUBAEI, ENGSTROM M, VIKLANDER M, et al. Effectiveness of a 19-year old combined pond-wetland system in removing particulate and dissolved pollutants[J]. Wetlands, 2017, 37(3):485-496. doi: 10.1007/s13157-017-0884-6 [32] WANG Z, WU J, MADDEN M, et al. China's wetlands:conservation plans and policy impacts[J]. Ambio, 2012, 41(7):782-786. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0280-7 -
点击查看大图
图(6) / 表(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 135
- HTML全文浏览量: 36
- PDF下载量: 181
- 被引次数: 0