Analysis and assessment on monthly dynamics of water quality at Taopu industrial zone in Shanghai

ZHANG Ting-hui; HUANG Min-sheng; MA Ming-hai; ZHANG Wen; CUI He

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2017.06.014

Issue 6

Nov. 2017

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences) > 2017 > (6): 147-155

ZHANG Ting-hui, HUANG Min-sheng, MA Ming-hai, ZHANG Wen, CUI He. Analysis and assessment on monthly dynamics of water quality at Taopu industrial zone in Shanghai[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2017, (6): 147-155. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2017.06.014

Citation:

ZHANG Ting-hui, HUANG Min-sheng, MA Ming-hai, ZHANG Wen, CUI He. Analysis and assessment on monthly dynamics of water quality at Taopu industrial zone in Shanghai[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2017, (6): 147-155. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2017.06.014

Citation:

PDF( 1029 KB)

Analysis and assessment on monthly dynamics of water quality at Taopu industrial zone in Shanghai

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2017.06.014

1.
School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
2.
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Huangshan University, Huangshan Anhui 245041, China

Received Date: 2016-11-17
Publish Date: 2017-11-25

Abstract

Abstract

Taking pH, WT, DO, SD, BOD₅, COD_Cr, COD_Mn, TOC, NH₃-N, NO₃-N, TN, Chl-a, DP and TP as the primary parameters, four medium or small creeks in Shanghai Taopu industry area are chosen as research rivers to evaluate the water quality, analyze temporal variation of water quality and identify pollution sources, by using analysis method such as principal component analysis, comprehensive pollution index, comprehensive nutritive index, organic pollution index and comprehensive water quality identification index. The research results indicate that Gongye River was the most polluted river in the four rivers, followed by Xiaozhai River and Zhangjin River, and Hongqi River was the best. TN and TP were the primary pollution parameters. DP was the main composition of TP, and NH₃-N is the main composition of TN. In industry area, pollution control of small malodorous rivers should focus on source control, and take the integrative measurements like "source control and retention".
- water quality,
- medium and small creek,
- index evaluation,
- malodorous river,
- monthly dynamics

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	王军, 邱少男.关于老工业区改造与"转方式、调结构"的思考——德国鲁尔区经济结构调整对青岛的借鉴[J].中国发展, 2012(3):12-15. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=zgfz201203004&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[2]	夏添.跨区域老工业区与大都市老工业区转型路径对比——以上海杨浦老工业区和东北老工业区为例[J].上海经济研究, 2015(6):123-129. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/97983X/201506/665447293.html
[3]	ZHENG H W, SHEN G Q, WANG H. A review of recent studies on sustainable urban renewal[J]. Habitat International, 2014, 41:272-279. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.08.006
[4]	BERTRAND O, MANSUV-HUAULT L, MONTARGES-PELLETIER E, et al. Molecular evidence for recent land use change from a swampy environment to a pond (Lorraine, France)[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2012, 50:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2012.06.004
[5]	黄燕, 黄民生, 徐亚同, 等.上海城市河道治理工程简介[J].环境工程, 2007(2):85-88. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjgc200702028
[6]	阮仁良, 黄长缨.苏州河水质黑臭评价方法和标准的探讨[J].上海水务, 2002(3):32-36. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/97649A/200203/6923068.html
[7]	瞿伟, 包卫彬. 产业结构转型为导向的我国资源型城市可持续发展模式研究——以法国洛林地区可持续发展案例为鉴[C]//中国可持续发展研究会2005年学术年会论文集(上册). 上海: 2005中国可持续发展论坛, 2005: 111-115. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-ZGST200509001024.htm
[8]	尹贻梅, 刘志高, 刘卫东, 等.城市老工业区创意转型路径研究:以北京石景山为例[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2011(6):55-60. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dlxygtyj201106012
[9]	邹丛阳, 张维佳, 李欣华, 等.城市河道水质恢复技术及发展趋势[J].环境科学与技术, 2007(8):99-102. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjkxyjs200708036
[10]	何平, 徐玉裕, 周侣艳, 等.杭州市区主要河道水质评价及评价方法的选择[J].浙江大学学报(理学版), 2014(3):324-330. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zjdxxb201403018
[11]	汪晓燕, 钟声.不同季节太湖流域氨氮与总氮含量变化研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2014, 25:8712-8713. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.25.088
[12]	王英才, 刘永定, 郝宗杰, 等.上海市几条黑臭河道治理效果的比较与分析[J].水生生物学报, 2009(2):355-359. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ssswxb200902031
[13]	赵昊铭. 区域工业循环经济发展研究——以株洲清水塘工业区为例[D]. 湖南株洲: 湖南工业大学, 2012. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis/D367504
[14]	黄民生, 马明海.城市水体环境及其治理:案例分析[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2016.
[15]	汪建华, 王文浩, 何岩, 等.原位曝气修复黑臭河道底泥内源营养盐的示范工程效能分析[J].环境工程学报, 2016(9):5301-5307. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201504087
[16]	蔡聪, 朱竟益, 徐玉良, 等.基于主成分分析与模糊综合评价模型的昆山市老城区河道水质评价[J].水电能源科学, 2015(11):14-17. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=sdny201511004&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[17]	魏俊, 金敏莉, 杨瑾, 等.杭州市市区河道水环境质量评价方法研究[J].环境工程, 2015(S1):981-984. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=hjgc2015s1244&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ
[18]	王明翠, 刘雪芹, 张建辉.湖泊富营养化评价方法及分级标准[J].中国环境监测, 2002(5):47-49. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zghjjc200205018
[19]	徐祖信.我国河流综合水质标识指数评价方法研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(4):482-488. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjdxxb200504012
[20]	林海明.如何用SPSS软件一步算出主成分得分值[J].统计与信息论坛, 2007(5):15-17. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjyxxlt200705003
[21]	张小君, 徐中民, 宋晓谕, 等.几种水环境质量评价方法在青海湖入湖河流中的应用[J].环境工程, 2013(1):117-121. doi: 10.11835/j.issn.1005-2909.2013.01.027