Health assessment of transboundary rivers based on the PSR and matter-element extension models: A case study of Taipu River

XIE Yihan; LI Gen; YANG Mengjie; CHU Xiaoye

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.201831013

Issue 1

Jan. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences) > 2020 > (1): 110-122

XIE Yihan, LI Gen, YANG Mengjie, CHU Xiaoye. Health assessment of transboundary rivers based on the PSR and matter-element extension models: A case study of Taipu River[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2020, (1): 110-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.201831013

Citation:

XIE Yihan, LI Gen, YANG Mengjie, CHU Xiaoye. Health assessment of transboundary rivers based on the PSR and matter-element extension models: A case study of Taipu River[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2020, (1): 110-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.201831013

Citation:

PDF( 734 KB)

Health assessment of transboundary rivers based on the PSR and matter-element extension models: A case study of Taipu River

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.201831013

XIE Yihan^1,2,
LI Gen^{1,2
,
,},
YANG Mengjie^1,2,
CHU Xiaoye^1,2

1.
School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai　200241, China
2.
Shanghai Key Lab for Urban Ecological Processes and Eco-Restoration, East China Normal University, Shanghai　200241, China

Received Date: 2018-12-29
Available Online: 2019-12-26
Publish Date: 2020-01-01

Abstract

Abstract

Taking Taipu River as an example, a multi-index assessment system for the water body and riparian zone is constructed based on the PSR model. Index weights are calculated with the entropy weight method, and the Taipu River is evaluated using the PSR and matter-element extension models. The results show that the Wujiang segment is classified as “high pressure-good state-low response ability”, the Jiashan segment is classified as “low pressure-medium state-low response ability”, and Qingpu segment is classified as “low pressure-medium state-high response ability”. The result of the health assessment of Wujiang is Grade Ⅲ (poor). Meanwhile, Jiashan and Qingpu are both Grade Ⅱ (medium), but leaning towards Grade I (good); this indicates that although the current health status of the river is medium, the health status of the water source area could be gradually restored by further increasing protection of the water source given that the policy is to some extent already effective. The results can provide decision support for river management and ecological construction of the riparian zone in Taipu River.
- river health assessment,
- PSR model,
- matter-element extension model,
- transboundary river,
- classification assessment

FullText(HTML)

References(33)

References

[1]	杨哲, 杨侃, 刘朗, 等. 组合赋权模糊熵-灰云聚类二维河流健康评价 [J]. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(5): 90-94.
[2]	李艳利, 李艳粉, 赵丽, 等. 基于不同生物类群的河流健康评价研究 [J]. 水利学报, 2016, 47(8): 1025-1034.
[3]	顾晓昀, 徐宗学, 刘麟菲, 等. 北京北运河河流生态系统健康评价 [J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(6): 2576-2587.
[4]	李杨, 李斌, 李淑丹, 等. 洱海流域河流生态系统健康评价 [J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(3): 427-431.
[5]	郭宁, 林泽昕, 方国华, 等. 基于灰色多层次模型的河流综合功能评价 [J]. 水利经济, 2016, 34(6): 38-81. DOI: 10.3880/j.issn.1003-9511.2016.06.010.
[6]	王永刚, 伍娟丽, 王旭, 等. 北京市中心城河流表层沉积物重金属污染评价 [J]. 南水北调与水利科技, 2017, 15(6): 74-80.
[7]	孙博, 黄莹, 李永霞, 等. 基于主成分分析的河流沉积物重金属污染评价 [J]. 环境科学与技术, 2016, 39(10): 175-184.
[8]	汪冬冬, 杨凯, 车越, 等. 河段尺度的上海苏州河河岸带综合评价 [J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(13): 3501-3510.
[9]	何娟. 黄浦江上游河岸带生态系统健康评价及调控管理探讨 [D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2016.
[10]	田晶晶. 黄浦江河岸带生态健康评价研究 [D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2015.
[11]	陈展. 黄浦江河岸带结构及其健康评价研究 [D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2015.
[12]	施展. 平原河网地区城市河流滨岸带生境评价研究 [D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2008.
[13]	任建丽, 金海龙, 叶茂, 等. 基于PSR模型对艾比湖流域生态系统健康评价研究 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(2): 37-41.
[14]	杨志, 赵冬至, 林元烧. 基于PSR模型的河口生态安全评价指标体系研究 [J]. 海洋环境科学, 2011, 30(1): 139-142. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6336.2011.01.032.
[15]	王雪梅, 柴仲平, 热依拉·阿里木江. 基于PSR模型的艾比湖流域生态安全评价研究 [J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2013, 30(5): 86-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4944.2013.05.019.
[16]	解雪峰, 吴涛, 肖翠, 等. 基于PSR模型的东阳江流域生态安全评价 [J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36(8): 1702-1711.
[17]	皮庆, 王小林, 成金华, 等. 基于PSR模型的环境承载力评价指标体系与应用研究——以武汉城市圈为例 [J]. 科技管理研究, 2016, 36(6): 238-244. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7695.2016.06.044.
[18]	李念春. 基于PSR模型的土壤环境承载力综合评价——以黄河三角洲高效生态经济区为例 [J]. 国土资源科技管理, 2016, 33(5): 117-125. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4210.2016.05.017.
[19]	CAI W. The extension set and non-compatible problems [M]// CHEN W Z. Advances Mathematics and Mechanics in China. Beijing: International Academic Publishers, 1990.
[20]	WANG Q, LI S Q, HE G, et al. Evaluating sustainability of water-energy-food (WEF) nexus using an improved matter-element extension model: A case study of China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 206: 1097-1106.
[21]	HE Y X, DAI A Y, ZHU J, et al. Risk assessment of urban network planning in China based on the matter-element model and extension analysis [J]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2011, 33: 775-782.
[22]	LIU Y. Assessment of city environmental quality in Western China based on matter element extension—A case study of Chongqing [J]. Energy Procedia, 2011(5): 619-623.
[23]	蒋天文, 樊志宏. 大江大河从“公共资源”到“公地悲剧”演变的内在机理分析 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2006(3): 315-319. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8227.2006.03.009.
[24]	齐姗姗, 巩杰, 钱彩云, 等. 基于SRP模型的甘肃省白龙江流域生态环境脆弱性评价 [J]. 水土保持通报, 2017, 37(1): 224-228.
[25]	王志杰, 苏嫄. 南水北调中线汉中市水源地生态脆弱性评价与特征分析 [J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2): 432-442.
[26]	牛振华, 臧贵敏, 张钰娴, 等. 太湖流域片水土流失生态脆弱区划分探究 [J]. 浙江水利科技, 2017, 45(6): 1-4.
[27]	李平星, 陈诚. 基于VSD模型的经济发达地区生态脆弱性评价——以太湖流域为例 [J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(2): 237-243. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2014.02.009.
[28]	水利部水资源司. 河流健康评估. 标准与方法(试点工作用)(办资源[2010]484号) [Z]. 北京: 水利部办公厅, 2010.
[29]	薛浩, 郑丙辉, 孟凡生, 等. 基于着生硅藻指数的梧桐河水生态健康评价 [J]. 生态毒理学报, 2018, 13(4): 83-90. DOI: 10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20180408003.
[30]	杨勇, 任志远, 樊新生. 中原城市群土地利用综合评价与分区研究 [J]. 经济地理, 2017, 37(9): 177-184.
[31]	张可刚, 赵翔, 邵学强. 河流生态系统健康评价研究 [J]. 水资源保护, 2005(6): 15-18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6933.2005.06.004.
[32]	张金春, 张家宾, 李超亚, 等. 可拓模式识别算法中经典域的确定方法 [J]. 海军航空工程学院学报, 2015, 30(1): 87-90. DOI: 10.7682/j.issn.1673-1522.2015.01.018.
[33]	李祚泳, 蔺雷, 邓新民. 雹云识别的物元可拓模型及其效果检验 [J]. 高原气象, 2001(2): 197-201. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0534.2001.02.014.