利用质疑改进教育信息技术标准化活动：更多关注其范围和原理

T.HOEL; J.MASON

利用质疑改进教育信息技术标准化活动：更多关注其范围和原理

T.HOEL¹,
J.MASON²

1.
奥斯陆和阿克什胡斯应用技术学院教育研发中心,奥斯陆 0130,挪威;
2.
昆士兰科技大学教育学院,昆士兰 4001,澳大利亚

详细信息

中图分类号: TP311
计量
- 文章访问数: 2211
- HTML全文浏览量: 52
- PDF下载量: 2225
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2011-09-01
- 修回日期: 2011-12-01
- 刊出日期: 2012-03-25

Problematizing the way we do standards: focussing more on scope and rationale

T. HOEL¹,
J. MASON²

1.
Centre for Educational Research and Development, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, Oslo NO-0130, Norway;
2.
Faculty of Education, Queensland University of Technology, QLD 4001, Australia

摘要

摘要: 标准化对于开发学习、教育和培训（LET）中使用的信息通信技术（ICT）有重要意义，但ICT的利益相关者（stakeholders）却往往质疑标准化活动.本文提出，利用这种质疑形式来分析和改进当前的ICT标准化活动.讨论了由各方参与产生ICT标准过程的模型框架，其中一系列为什么的问题（Why questions）起着重要作用.讨论主要围绕两个方面：一是标准及相关事物在发展过程中的管理与核准；二是如何识别LET中的相关问题与可用来解决这些问题的创新技术.给出了两个事例：一个是对内容共享对象参考模型（Sharable Content Object Reference Model, SCORM）的质疑，这能帮助理解该模型；特别是对其适用范围（scope）的质疑而使该模型更完善.另一个是对制定新工作条款（New Work Items）必要性的质疑，使人们认识到澄清标准中有关技术原理（rationale）的重要性.
- 标准管理 /
- ICT标准 /
- 数字化学习 /
- 信息系统架构 /
- 企业框架 /
- ITLET（学习、教育和培训中的信息技术）
Abstract: This paper brings together two perspectives on current developments in information and communications technology (ICT) utilized for the purposes of learning, education, and training (LET). One perspective is concerned with governance and legitimacy issues regarding the process and relevance of standards development; the other, is concerned with the role of discerning relevant questions in LET and the potential scope for innovation that might develop tools to support such discernment. Discussion of information systems architecture is introduced as a means to set the context and provide a framework for bringing together an overall narrative and coherence to these two perspectives. Questions initiated by why are of particular interest because they typically demand an explanation in natural language to satisfy the questioner. By focusing on why as a key primitive of enquiry the authors present an approach that might inform improved processes of ICT for LET (a.k.a ITLET) standardization.
- standards governance /
- ICT standards /
- e-Learning /
- information systems architecture /
- enterprise frameworks /
- ITLET

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1]

［1］ CARGILL C F. Information Technology Standardization: Theory, Process, and Organizations［M］. MA, USA: Digital Press, 1989.

［2］ COLLIER G, ROBSON R. eLearning Interoperability Standards, a White Paper［R］. Santa Clara, California: Sun Microsystems, 2002.

［3］ COOPER A R. Key challenges in the design of learning technology standards: observations and proposals［J］. International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, 2010, 8(2): 2029.

［4］ EGYEDI T. Shaping Standardization: A study of standards processes and standards policies in the field of telematic services［M］. Delf: Delf University Press, 1996.

［5］ EGYEDI T M, SHERIF M H. Standards’ dynamics through an innovation lens: next generation ethernet networks［C］∥Proceedings of the First ITUT Kaleidoscope Academic Conference. Genera:［s.n.］,2008: 127134. 

［6］ EVERED R. A Typology of Explicative Models［M］∥Foundations for Inquiry: Choices and Tradeoffs in the Organizational Sciences. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Press, 2005.

［7］ GRAESSER A, RUS V, CAI Z. Question Classification Schemes［DB/OL］.2007［20120206］. http://www.cs.memphis.edu/~vrus/questiongeneration/16GraesserEtAlQG08.pdf.

［8］ GRAESSER A, OTERO J, CORBETT A, et al. Guidelines for Question Generation Shared Task Evaluation Campaigns［R］∥The Question Generation Shared Task and Evaluation Challenge Workshop Report. Memphis: University of Memphis, 2008. 

［9］ GRAESSER A, RUS V, D’MELLO S, et al. Learning through Natural Language Dialogue that Adapts to the Cognitive and Affective States of the Learner［M］∥Recent Innovations in Education Technology That Facilitate Student Learning. NC: Information Age Publishing, 2008.

［10］ HOEL T, HOLLINS P A. Learning technology standards adoption: how to improve process and product legitimacy［C］∥Proceedings of ICALT, 2008.

［11］ HOEL T, PAWLOWSKI J M. Key knowledge sharing points: exploring a new concept for studying crossroads in global innovation projects［C］∥ECKM 2011.［S.l.］: University of Passau Germany, 2011.

［12］ JAKOBS K, PROCTER R, WILLIAMS R. Standardization and implementation of information technology［C］∥Proc Int Resource Management Assoc.［S.l.］: IRMA, 2001. 

［13］ ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2: Rules for the structure and drafting of international standards, Section 4.2［S］. 2004［20120206］. http:∥isotc.iso.org.

［14］ JOVANOVIC V, MRDALJ S, GARDINER A. A Zachman Cube ［J］. Issues in Information Systems, 2006, 7(2): 16. 

［15］ LEPPNEN M. An Ontological Framework and Methodical Skeleton for Method Engineering［M］. ［S.l.］: University of Jyvskyl, 2005.

［16］ MASON J. A model for sensemaking: exploring why in the context of learning and knowing［C］∥Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computers in Education. Taipei: AsiaPacific Society for Computers in Education, 2008. 

［17］ ADL CoLaboratory. Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM), Version 1.0, January 2000［S］.

［18］ SNOWDEN D. The cynefin framework［DB/OL］. 1999［20120206］. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynefin.

［19］ SNOWDEN D. Multiontology sense making: a new simplicity in decision making, cynefin centre, UK［DB/OL］. 2005［20120206］. http://www.cognitiveedge.com/ceresources/articles/40_Multiontology_sense_makingv2_May05.pdf. 

［20］ SNOWDEN D. Complex acts of knowingparadox and descriptive self awareness ［J］. Journal of Knowledge Management Special Issue,2002.  ［21］ THEIJSSEN D. Automatically classifying why-questions with the help of syntax［DB/OL］∥Leiden Working Papers in Linguistics 5.1. 2008［2012-02-06］.http://www.lucl.nl.

［22］ TIDD J, BESSANT J. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change［M］. 4th ［S.l.］: Wiley, 2009:638.

［23］ VERBENE S. In Search of the Why: Developing a system for answering why-questions, Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud Universiteit ［DB/OL］. 2010［2012-02-06］.http://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/76174.

［24］ WIERZBICKI A P, NAKAMORI Y. Creative Space: Models of Creative Processes for the Knowledge Civilization Age, Studies in Computational Intelligence ［M］. The Netherlands:Springer, 2006. 

［25］ ZACHMAN J A. A framework for information systems architecture ［J］. IBM Systems Journal, 1987, 26(3): 276-293.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计