水体扰动对黑臭河道内源氮营养盐赋存形式的影响

张一璠; 陈玉霞; 何岩; 黄民生

水体扰动对黑臭河道内源氮营养盐赋存形式的影响

1.
华东师范大学环境科学系,上海 200062

详细信息

中图分类号: Q948
计量
- 文章访问数: 2622
- HTML全文浏览量: 49
- PDF下载量: 2031
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2011-10-01
- 修回日期: 2012-01-01
- 刊出日期: 2013-03-25

Effects of turbulence on the behavior of endogenous nitrogen in malodorous river

1.
Department of Environmental Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

摘要

摘要: 设计了一套模拟河道底泥再悬浮装置，设定4个不同水体扰动强度的工况以及1个不扰动对照组，测量了不同水体扰动强度产生的流速以及溶解氧（DO）浓度变化情况，并据此计算出不同工况的雷诺数（Re）.研究了不同扰动强度下氨氮、亚硝氮、硝氮和总氮在上覆水、浮泥层间隙水和黑泥层间隙水中的迁移转化规律.结果表明：不同曝气扰动强度引起不同溶解氧梯度分布，并导致底泥中内源氮营养盐赋存形式之间的不同转化途径，其中流速为28.8～32.0 cm/s时，Re为1 810～2 113，DO平均值为5.08～7.50 mg/L，上覆水中氨氮和总氮去除效果最好，表明曝气扰动对底泥内源氮中氨氮和总氮的转化行为影响最大.与不产生曝气扰动时相比，由于曝气复氧作用，浮泥层呈现较高的亚硝氮和硝氮浓度，这导致二者分别向上覆水和黑泥层扩散.对于扩散至黑泥层的亚硝氮和硝氮，会在缺氧或厌氧环境的黑泥层中进一步通过反硝化或厌氧氨氧化途径实现对内源氮的完全脱除.
- 黑臭河道 /
- 内源氮 /
- 水体扰动 /
- 迁移转化 /
- 雷诺数
Abstract: A simulation system was designed for river sediment resuspension. Four different aeration turbulent intensity working conditions and one static control were set up. Flow velocities under different turbulent intensities and their dissolved oxygen concentrations were measured. The Reynolds number （Re） of each condition was calculated. The migration and transformation behaviors of four nitrogen forms (ammonia, nitrite, nitrate and total nitrogen in overlying water and pore water from fluid mud layer and black layer) were analyzed. The results showed that DO concentration distributed with various aeration turbulent intensities, which lead different transformation pathways of occurrence of endogenous nitrogen .Under the condition of 28.8~32.0 cm/s flow velocities and 1 810~2 113 the Reynolds numbers, ammonia and total nitrogen in overlying water exhibited better removal efficiency, indicating that turbulent intensity played a significant role in the transformation process of endogenous ammonia and total nitrogen. Compared with static control regime, areation made the fluid mud layer have a higher nitrite and nitrate concentration, it may diffuse to overlying water and black layer. The diffusion nitrite and nitrate in black layer should adopt denitrification or anaerobic ammonium oxidation pathways to remove endogenous nitrogen under hypoxia or anaerobic condition.
- malodorous river /
- endogenous nitrogen /
- water turbulence /
- migration and transformation /
- Reynolds number

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1]

［1］ MURPHY T P, LAWSON A, KUMAGAI M, et al. Review of emerging issue in sediment treatment［J］. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management, 1999, 2(4): 419-434.

［2］陈静生. 水环境化学,［M］. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1987.

［3］金相灿. 湖泊富营养化控制和管理技术［M］. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2001.

［4］秦伯强,朱广伟,张路,等. 大型浅水湖泊沉积物内源营养盐释放模式及其估算方法,以太湖为例［J］. 中国科学D辑, 2005, 35（增刊2）: 33-44.

［5］ RYDIN E，BRUNBERG A K. Seasonal dynamics of phosphorus in Lake Erken surface sediments［J］. Acrh Hydrobiol Spec Issues Advanc Limnol, 1998, 51: 157-167.

［6］张丽萍,袁文权,张锡辉. 底泥污染物释放动力学研究［J］. 环境污染治理技术与设备, 2003, 4(2): 22-26.

［7］孙亚敏,董曼玲,汪家权. 内源污染对湖泊富营养化的作用及对策［J］. 合肥工业大学学报：自然科学版, 2000, 23(2): 210-213.

［8］贺宝根,周乃晟,袁宣民. 底泥对河流的二次污染［J］. 环境污染与防治, 1999, 21(3): 41-43.

［9］孙从军,张明旭. 河道曝气技术在河流污染治理中的应用［J］. 环境保护, 2001(4): 12-14, 20.

［10］冯海艳,李文霞,杨忠芳,等. 上覆水溶解氧水平对苏州城市河道底泥吸附/释放磷影响的研究［J］. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(5): 227-234.

［11］顾俊,刘德启,陆璐露,等. 城市内河生物修复及其对底泥氮素转化影响的实验研究［J］. 环境工程学报, 2008, 2(6): 733-736.

［12］袁文权, 张锡辉, 张丽萍. 不同供氧方式对水库底泥氮磷释放的影响［J］. 湖泊科学, 2004, 16(1): 28-34. 

［13］谌建宇,许振成,骆其金,等. 曝气复氧对滇池重污染支流底泥污染物迁移转化的影响［J］. 生态环境, 2008, 17(16): 2154-2158.

［14］ RUAN A, HE R, XU S, et al. Effect of dissolved oxygen on nitrogen purification of microbial ecosystem in sediments［J］. Journal of Environmental Science and Health (Part A), 2009, 44(4): 397-405.

［15］ GIN K Y H, GOPALAKRISHNAN A P. Sediment oxygen demand and nutrient fluxes for a tropical reservoir in Singapore［J］. Journal of Environmental Engineering-Asce, 2010, 136(1): 78-85.

［16］刘伟,陈振楼,王军,等. 小城镇河流沉积物无机氮迁移循环研究［J］. 农业环境科学学报, 2004, 23(3): 520-524.

［17］ TEASDALE P R, BATLEY G E, APTE S C, et al. Pore water sampling with sediment peepers［J］. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 1995, 14(6): 250-256．

［18］傅平青,刘丛强,吴丰昌,等. 洱海沉积物孔隙水中溶解有机质的三维荧光光谱特征［J］. 第四纪研究, 2004, 24(6): 695-702.

［19］肖洋,唐洪武,毛野,等. 新型声学多普勒流速仪及其应用［J］. 河海大学学报：自然科学版, 2002, 30(3): 15-18.

［20］宇振涛,黄秋萍. 环境监测中几种常用的废水流速测定方法的分析和探讨［J］. 北方环境, 2011(7): 138, 149.

［21］国家环保局. 水和废水监测分析方法［M］. 4版. 北京: 中国环境科学出版社出版, 2002.

［22］张朝能. 水体中饱和溶解氧的求算方法探讨［J］. 环境科学研究, 1999(2): 54-55.

［23］ LIMPIYAKORN T, SHINOHARA Y, KURISU F, et al. Communities of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge of various sewage treatment plants in Tokyo［J］. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2005, 54(2): 205-217.

［24］ WANG J L, YANG N. Partial nitrification under limited dissolved oxygen conditions［J］. Process Biochemistry, 2004, 39(10): 1223-1229.

［25］ YOU S J, CHEN W Y. Ammonia oxidizing bacteria in a nitrite-accumulating membrane bioreactor［J］. International Biodeterioration&Biodegradation, 2008, 62(3): 244-249.

［26］刘波,王国祥,王风贺,等. 不同曝气方式对城市重污染河道水体氮素迁移与转化的影响［J］. 环境科学, 2011, 32(10): 2971-2978.

［27］荣伟英,周启星. 大沽排污河底泥释放总氮的影响［J］. 环境科学学报, 2012, 32(2): 326-331.

［28］李文红,陈英旭,孙建平. 不同溶解氧水平对控制底泥向上覆水体释放污染物的影响研究［J］. 农业环境科学学报, 2003, 22(2): 170-173.

［29］ BOYNTON W R， KEMP W M. Nutrient regeneration and oxygen consumption by sediments along an estuarine salinity gradient［J］. Marine Ecology Progerss Series, 1985, 23: 45-55.

［30］郑平,徐向阳,胡宝兰. 新型生物脱氮理论与技术［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 2004.

［31］吴群河,曾学云,黄钥. 溶解氧对河流底泥中三氮释放的影响［J］. 环境污染与防治, 2005, 27(1): 21-24,52.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计