Purification effect of different aquatic plant configuration modes to the landfill leachate tail water
-
摘要: 根据上海老港垃圾填埋场渗滤液尾水的水质特性,研究黄菖蒲、菖蒲和再力花3种挺水植物在不同配置模式下,在室内静水实验中,其植物的生物量变化及对尾水的TN、TP和COD净化效果.结果表明,植物对渗滤液尾水的TN和TP净化效果显著,去除率均在75.1%以上,对COD的去除率最高为62.8%;其中,3种植物混合模式对TN和TP净化效果优于两两混植和单种种植,对COD净化效果差异性不显著.另外,净化效果与植物生物量、单位富集量和不同植物间的协同净化作用密切相关.因此,在净化水体时,有必要结合实际情况,针对性地进行植物配置模式优化,以确保净化效果更有效.Abstract: Based on the water quality of landfill leachate tail water of the Laogang Garbage Landfill in Shanghai, the purification effect to TN, TP and COD in the tail water and biomass changes of three emerged plants Acorus calamus, Iris pseudacorus and Thalia dealbata in different configuration modes under hydrostatic conditions were investigated. Results showed that the purification effect to TN, TP of leachate tail water was distinct, the removal rate being over 75.1%, while the COD removal rate belows 62.8%. TN, TP purification effect of the three plant mixed mode was superior to that of the two mixed modes and the single plant mode; but there are no significant differences to COD removal rate among different modes. It is necessary to consider the actual conditions to select suitable plant configuration mode to ensure more effective purification efficiency because the purification effect is closely related to plant biomass, enrichment of unit volume, and different cooperative purification between plants in purifying water body.
-
Key words:
- aquatic plants /
- configuration mode /
- landfill leachate tail water /
- purification
-
[1] [1] 付智娟,刘亚敏,孙桂琴.垃圾渗滤液的处理技术及其研究方向[J].江西化工,2005(4):68-71.[2] 周益洪,周恭民,梅亚青.人工湿地处理垃圾渗滤液[J].环境卫生工程,2005,13(3):10-13.[3] USEPE. Guilding Principle of Constructed Treatment Wetland: Providing for Water Wualitity and Wildlife Habitat [M]. Washington DC: USEPA, Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watershed, 2000.[4] MULAMOOTTIL G, MCBEAN E A, ROVERS F. Constructed Wetlands for the Treatment of Landfill Leachates [M].USA:CRC Press, 1998: 63-69.[5] 陈韫真,叶纪良.深圳白泥坑、雁田人工湿地污水处理场[J].电力环境保护,1996,12(1):47-51.[6] 达良俊,陈鸣.凤眼莲不同部位对重金属的吸收、吸附作用研究[J].上海环境学,2003,22(11): 765-767.[7] 刘利华,郭雪艳,达良俊.不同富营养化水平对挺水植物生长及氮磷吸收能力的影响[J].华东师范大学学报:自然科学版,2012(6):39-45.[8] 杨珏.不同水生植物配置模式对垃圾填埋场渗滤液尾水的净化能力研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2011.[9] 金树权,周金波,朱晓丽,等,10种水生植物的氮磷吸收和水质净化能力比较研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2010,29(8):1571-1575.[10] 夏汉平.香根草和水花生对垃圾污水中N、P、Cl的吸收效果[J].植物生态学报,2000, 24(5): 613-616.[11] 夏汉平,敖惠修,刘世忠,等.应用香根草对垃圾场进行植被恢复及净化垃圾污水的研究[J].广州环境科学,2003,17(1):34-37.[12] 刘鸣达,赵玉婷.凤眼莲去除垃圾渗滤液中的COD、NH3-N和P[J].环境工程学报,2012,6(6):1875-1879. [13] 侯晓龙,马祥庆.水生植物对垃圾渗滤液中重金属的吸附效果研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2007,26(6):2262-2266.[14] GB16889—2008 生活垃圾填埋场污染控制标准[S].北京:中华人民共和国环境保护部,2008.[15] 罗固源,肖华,韩金奎,等.人工浮床处理重污染河水的效能分析[J].重庆大学学报,2008, 31(8): 932,936.[16] 陈明利,吴晓芙,陈永华,等.景观型人工湿地污水处理系统构建及植物脱氮效应研究[J].环境科学,2010,31(3):660-666.[17] KICKUTH R. Degradation and Incorporation of Nutrients from Rural Wastewaters by Plant Rhizosphere under Limbic Conditions[M].London:Commission of the European Communities, 1977: 335-343.[18] 韩潇源,宋志文,李培英.高效净化氮磷污水的湿地水生植物筛选与组合湖泊科学[J].2008, 20(6): 741-747.[19] COLEMAN J, HENCH K, GARBUTT K, et al. Treatment of domestic wastewater by three plant species in constructed wetlands[J]. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 2001, 128: 283-295.[20] 彭婉婷,邹琳,段维波,等.多种湿地植物组合对污水中氮和磷的去除效[J].环境科学学报,2012 ,32(3):612-617.[21] 李淑英,周元清,胡承,等.水生植物组合后根际微生物及水净化研究[J].环境科学与技术, 2010,33(3):148-151.[22] 高吉喜,叶春,杜娟,等.水生植物对面源污水净化效率研究[J].中国环境科学, 1997,17(3): 247-251.[23] 王春景,杨海军,刘国经,等.菰和菖蒲对富营养化水体净化效率的比较[J].植物资源与环境学报,2007,16(1):40-41.[24] 赵建刚,陈章和.单种和多种群落湿地对污水的净化效果和植物生长生物量研究[J].应用与环境生物学报,2006,12(2):203-206.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1581
- HTML全文浏览量: 37
- PDF下载量: 2067
- 被引次数: 0