Comparative analysis of microbial communities on tobacco leaves  between clone library and highthroughput sequencing

GONG Jun; LIU Yu-Pei; LI Yuan-Yuan; 

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2016.03.011

Issue 3

Sep. 2016

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences) > 2016 > (3): 92-101

GONG Jun, LIU Yu-Pei, LI Yuan-Yuan, . Comparative analysis of microbial communities on tobacco leaves between clone library and highthroughput sequencing[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2016, (3): 92-101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2016.03.011

Citation:

GONG Jun, LIU Yu-Pei, LI Yuan-Yuan, . Comparative analysis of microbial communities on tobacco leaves between clone library and highthroughput sequencing[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Natural Sciences), 2016, (3): 92-101. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2016.03.011

Citation:

PDF( 1243 KB)

Comparative analysis of microbial communities on tobacco leaves between clone library and highthroughput sequencing

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5641.2016.03.011

GONG Jun¹,
LIU Yu-Pei¹,
LI Yuan-Yuan^{1,2
,
,},


Received Date: 2015-05-04
Publish Date: 2016-05-25

Abstract

Abstract

In order to compare the microbial communities on tobacco leaves between clone library method and highthroughput sequencing method, we analyzed the diversity of microbial communities based on bacterial 16S rDNA and fungal ITS on tobacco leaves collected from Fujian province in China. The results showed that more numbers of bacterial and fungal sequences were detected by highthroughput sequencing than clone library. The number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) clustered from highthroughput sequencing method was almost the same as that from clone library method in bacterial communities, while that was higher from highthroughput sequencing in fungal communities. The rarefaction curves drawn from highthroughput sequencing method tended to approach the saturation plateau. The expected community diversity indices (Chao1 and Ace) were higher in clone library method, whereas the observed community diversity indices (Simpson and Shannon) suggested that higher bacterial diversities were detected through clone library method and higher fungal diversities were detected through highthroughput sequencing method. There were more kinds of bacteria and fungi genera identified through highthroughput sequencing method. The dominant genera of bacteria were similar detected from both of the methods, including Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter and Sphingonomonas. However, the fungal genera detected through these two methods were significantly different. Overall, novel highthroughput sequencing methods outperform clone library approaches in terms of resolution and magnitude. They enable identification and relative quantification of community members of tobacco leaves and offer new insights into environmental microbiology. 
- clone libraryhighthroughput sequencingbacteriafungitobacco leaves,

FullText(HTML)

References(1)

References

[1]

［1］于建军, 李琳, 庞天河, 等. 烟叶发酵研究进展［J］. 河南农业大学学报, 2006, 40(1): 108112.

［2］刘萍, 张广民, 郑小嘎, 等. 烟叶表面微生物及其应用［J］. 微生物学通报, 2003, 30(6): 105110.

［3］韩锦峰, 朱大恒, 刘卫群, 等. 陈化发酵期间烤烟叶面微生物活性及其应用研究［J］. 中国烟草科学, 1997(4): 1516.

［4］邱立友, 赵铭钦, 岳雪梅, 等. 自然发酵烤烟叶面微生物区系的分离鉴定［J］. 烟草科技, 2000(3): 1417.

［5］AMANN R I, LUDWIG W, SCHLEIFER K H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation ［J］. Microbiological Reviews, 1995, 59(1): 143169.

［6］ZHAO M, WANG B, LI F, et al. Analysis of bacterial communities on aging fluecured tobacco leaves by 16S rDNA PCRDGGE technology ［J］. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 73(6): 14351440.

［7］HUANG J, YANG J, DUAN Y, et al. Bacterial diversities on unaged and aging fluecured tobacco leaves estimated by 16S rRNA sequence analysis ［J］. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 88(2): 553562.

［8］夏围围, 贾仲君. 高通量测序和DGGE分析土壤微生物群落的技术评价［J］. 微生物学报, 2014(12): 14891499.

［9］SU C, GU W, ZHE W, et al. Diversity and phylogeny of bacteria on Zimbabwe tobacco leaves estimated by 16S rRNA sequence analysis ［J］. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 92(5): 10331044.

［10］伍雪莹, 梁书利, 韩双艳, 等. 不同陈化期烤烟叶表细菌的多样性及发育分析［J］. 广东农业科学, 2014(18): 2833.

［11］陈竹亭, 焉婷婷, 汤朝起, 等. 应用16S rDNA克隆文库技术分析陈化烟叶细菌多样性［J］. 中国烟草学报, 2012(4): 7782.

［12］SIMON C, DANIEL R. Metagenomic analyses: Past and future trends ［J］. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(4): 11531161.

［13］GONTCHAROVA V, YOUN E, WOLCOTT R D, et al. Black box chimera check (B2C2): A windowsbased software for batch depletion of chimeras from bacterial 16S rRNA gene datasets ［J］. The Open Microbiology Journal, 2010(4): 4752.

［14］SCHLOSS P D, WESTCOTT S L, RYABIN T, et al. Introducing mothur: Opensource, platformindependent, communitysupported software for describing and comparing microbial communities ［J］. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(23): 75377541.

［15］CAPORASO J G, KUCZYNSKI J, STOMBAUGH J, et al. QIIME allows analysis of highthroughput community sequencing data ［J］. Nature Methods, 2010, 7(5): 335336.

［16］EDGAR R C, HAAS B J, CLEMENTE J C, et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection ［J］. Bioinformatics, 2011, 27(16): 21942200.

［17］EDGAR R C. UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads ［J］. Nature Methods, 2013, 10(10): 996998.

［18］COLE J R, WANG Q, FISH J A, et al. Ribosomal database project: Data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis ［J］. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013, 42(D1): D633D642.

［19］WANG Q, GARRITY G M, TIEDJE J M, et al. Naive bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy ［J］. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007, 73(16): 52615267.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views